Skip to content

TT-Autotune · data 2026-10-11

NEARNEAR trading bot: TT-Autotune tuned results by timeframe and regime

Tuned vs default Lorentzian Classification results for NEAR across 6 timeframes and six market regimes, and how to automate NEAR from TradingView paper first.

News

Headlines

No headlines yet.

NEAR with TT-Autotune

TT-Autotune tunes the Lorentzian Classification strategy separately for every token, chart timeframe and market regime, then switches to that regime's champion settings live inside one TradingView strategy alert. This page summarizes what the optimizer found for NEAR: 6 trained timeframes (5m, 15m, 30m, 1h, 4h, 1d) and 36 regime cells, of which 35 beat the stock default settings.

On tuned ROI averaged across regimes, the strongest NEAR timeframe is 1d (+100.3% mean), and its best single regime is Bear- at +201.1%. ROI here is the sum of per-trade ROI over each cell's walk-forward window, scored with fees and slippage, not a live result.

NEAR on the 5m chart

On 5m, 6 of 6 regimes beat the default settings, led by Quiet, which is no trend and low volatility: tight ranges where fees can eat most edges.

Bull+
tuned +15.7% vs default -1.2% (beats default by 16.9 pts)
Bull-
tuned +9.7% vs default -1.6% (beats default by 11.3 pts)
Bear+
tuned +13.3% vs default -0.2% (beats default by 13.4 pts)
Bear-
tuned +9.6% vs default -4.0% (beats default by 13.6 pts)
Chop
tuned +13.6% vs default +3.9% (beats default by 9.7 pts)
Quiet
tuned +21.4% vs default +0.7% (beats default by 20.7 pts)

NEAR on the 15m chart

On 15m, 6 of 6 regimes beat the default settings, led by Chop, which is no trend but high volatility: big swings in both directions where breakouts often fail.

Bull+
tuned +39.3% vs default -25.0% (beats default by 64.4 pts)
Bull-
tuned +43.8% vs default +5.9% (beats default by 38.0 pts)
Bear+
tuned +31.8% vs default +0.1% (beats default by 31.7 pts)
Bear-
tuned +23.4% vs default -2.0% (beats default by 25.4 pts)
Chop
tuned +46.0% vs default -0.8% (beats default by 46.9 pts)
Quiet
tuned +6.4% vs default -2.1% (beats default by 8.5 pts)

NEAR on the 30m chart

On 30m, 6 of 6 regimes beat the default settings, led by Quiet, which is no trend and low volatility: tight ranges where fees can eat most edges.

Bull+
tuned +60.5% vs default -3.6% (beats default by 64.1 pts)
Bull-
tuned +55.4% vs default -4.3% (beats default by 59.7 pts)
Bear+
tuned +12.5% vs default +0.0% (beats default by 12.5 pts)
Bear-
tuned +36.2% vs default -1.5% (beats default by 37.7 pts)
Chop
tuned +22.0% vs default +2.1% (beats default by 19.9 pts)
Quiet
tuned +62.8% vs default +3.5% (beats default by 59.3 pts)

NEAR on the 1h chart

On 1h, 6 of 6 regimes beat the default settings, led by Bull-, which is a weak uptrend: ADX of 18 or more with a gentler positive slope, grinding higher with frequent pullbacks.

Bull+
tuned +33.2% vs default -5.4% (beats default by 38.6 pts)
Bull-
tuned +48.5% vs default -8.9% (beats default by 57.4 pts)
Bear+
tuned +23.9% vs default +0.4% (beats default by 23.6 pts)
Bear-
tuned +34.2% vs default +4.8% (beats default by 29.4 pts)
Chop
tuned +44.9% vs default -23.7% (beats default by 68.6 pts)
Quiet
tuned +12.7% vs default +4.5% (beats default by 8.2 pts)

NEAR on the 4h chart

On 4h, 6 of 6 regimes beat the default settings, led by Chop, which is no trend but high volatility: big swings in both directions where breakouts often fail.

Bull+
tuned +93.5% vs default +17.6% (beats default by 75.9 pts)
Bull-
tuned +115.5% vs default -6.8% (beats default by 122.3 pts)
Bear+
tuned +60.6% vs default +6.0% (beats default by 54.6 pts)
Bear-
tuned +34.9% vs default +34.4% (beats default by 0.5 pts)
Chop
tuned +138.7% vs default -23.0% (beats default by 161.6 pts)
Quiet
tuned +23.6% vs default -4.0% (beats default by 27.6 pts)

NEAR on the 1d chart

On 1d, 5 of 6 regimes beat the default settings, led by Bear-, which is a weak downtrend: a slow bleed with sharp bounces and frequent short squeezes.

Bull+
tuned +72.9% vs default -14.9% (beats default by 87.8 pts)
Bull-
tuned +106.7% vs default +0.0% (beats default by 106.7 pts)
Bear+
tuned +87.3% vs default -42.6% (beats default by 129.9 pts)
Bear-
tuned +201.1% vs default +37.4% (beats default by 163.7 pts)
Chop
tuned +133.9% vs default -11.0% (beats default by 144.9 pts)
Quiet
tuned +0.0% vs default +0.0% (trails default by 0.0 pts)

How to read these NEAR numbers

These are optimizer results on historical data, and every champion had to pass gates before publication: positive Sortino and ROI in its regime, beating the default on both, enough trades spread across walk-forward windows, and a plateau rather than a spike. Longer timeframes cover longer calendar windows, so compare timeframes with care. TensorTrader's forward testnet books have not yet shown an edge after fees, so treat any NEAR cell as a hypothesis to paper trade, not a forecast.

Trade NEAR from TradingView

  1. 1Connect a trade-only key on a live-ready venue that lists NEAR perpetuals, on testnet first.
  2. 2Open the TensorTrader extension's TT-Autotune tab, select that key and browse the NEAR cells.
  3. 3Enroll the NEAR timeframes you want; each becomes one strategy alert with its regime champions injected.
  4. 4Watch fills and closed-trade accounting on paper before any live opt-in.

Not financial advice. Figures are TensorTrader optimizer or backtest results with the method stated; past results do not predict future returns.

Guides · Start on paper